Frank v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• applying enrolled bill rule to reject challenge that legislature failed to provide copies of legislation creating conservation district as required by article XVI, section 59(e)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

16 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Hawkins v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1983-10-19· cited 351×
• Quinones v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1980-01-09· cited 312×
• Dickens v. Court of Appeals for the Second Supreme Judicial District of Texas
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1987-03-25· cited 258×
• Turpin v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1980-10-29· cited 106×
• Pena v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 10th Dist. (Waco)· 2007-05-02· cited 95×
• Iness v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1980-09-10· cited 87×
• Butler v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1987-09-16· cited 63×
• Sattiewhite v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1980-05-07· cited 63×
• Showery v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 8th Dist. (El Paso)· 1985-05-08· cited 19×
• Reynolds v. Dickens
  Court of Appeals of Texas· 1985-02-27· cited 11×
• Kee v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 5th Dist. (Dallas)· 1984-05-09· cited 10×
• Luvano v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 11th Dist. (Eastland)· 2006-03-01· cited 7×
• Calamaco v. State
  Court of Appeals of Texas· 1983-04-13· cited 4×
• Shad Edward Luvano v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 11th Dist. (Eastland)· 2006-02-02
• Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion
  Texas Attorney General Reports· 2000-07-02
• Chavez v. State
  Court of Appeals of Texas· 1981-10-08