Skip to main content
· 8/28/2009

Frank v. Dana Corp.

Citations

  • 649 F. Supp. 2d 729
  • 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 77030
  • 2009 WL 2782670

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • plaintiffs could have amended complaint in response to motion to dismiss, but amendment after responsive pleading would cause an extensive delay

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: James G. Carr

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.