Frank Corridore v. Heidi Washington

Oral argument

• Argued

  33 min recording
  Listen

Source: CourtListener oral-argument corpus (CC0).

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that a dog bite and cuts were “a constitutionally cognizable injury” and that officer used force by releasing a police dog into a house to do a search with instructions to bite whomever he encountered
• weighing in favor of police on the second factor because the officers reasonably believed arrestee was armed
• “Every reasonable officer would know they cannot enter a house based on the occupant’s silence without first making an implicit or explicit request to enter.”
• “Implicit consent can be inferred from silence or failure to object to a search only if that silence follows a request for consent.” (internal quotation marks omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).