Massachusetts Appeals Court· 6/26/1980

Frank Cooke, Inc. v. Hurwitz

Citations

406 N.E.2d 678
10 Mass. App. Ct. 99
1980 Mass. App. LEXIS 1208

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

explaining that the discovery rule does not apply beyond the time when plaintiff was informed that “defendant was not competent to render investment advice”
explaining that even though an accountant may have been negligent in not reporting the “doubtful collectibility” of a loan, the loan was worthless at the time and, thus, the accountant was not liable
discussing claim of accounting malpractice resulting in economic loss but barred by statute of limitations
discussing claim of accounting malpractice resulting in economic loss but barred by statute of limitations
defendant must conceal the existence of cause of action through some affirmative act done with intent to deceive to toll statute of limitation
plaintiff under § 11 must show loss of money or property

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Grant, Hale, Nolan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

63 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

18 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.