Skip to main content

Frangias v. State

Citations

  • 392 S.W.3d 642
  • 2013 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 1890
  • 2013 WL 690859

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that courts must not second-guess informed strategic or tactical decisions made by counsel during trial but instead must indulge strong presumption that counsel’s conduct falls within wide range of reasonable professional assistance
  • noting that abándonment of alternative ways of implementing a particular trial strategy is reasonable only if trial counsel undertook reasonable efforts to pursue such alternatives and brought a professionally appropriate level of knowledge and skill to bear before choosing to abandon them
  • noting even single instance of counsel’s error that is egregious and has seriously deleterious impact on balance of representation may rise to level of deficient performance
  • noting that defendants are not entitled to error-free representation
  • cautioning courts against second-guessing trial counsel’s “informed strategic or tactical decisions”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Price, Keller, Womack, Johnson, Keasler, Hervey, Cochran, Alcala, Meyers

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

32 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.