Francis v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding proffered newly discovered evidence in the form of eyewitness testimony from two disinterested witnesses placing defendant away from the scene of crime did not merely impeach the victim‟s testimony, but had “independent, probative merit of its own”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

11 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Mitchell v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 2000-04-18· cited 118×
• Bustamante v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1990-08-07· cited 109×
• Fox v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1991-03-19· cited 53×
• Bunch v. State
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2012-03-21· cited 50×
• Thomas v. State
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 1990-11-01· cited 30×
• Lyles v. State
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 1991-08-27· cited 28×
• Tyson v. State
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 1993-12-20· cited 13×
• Perry v. State
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 1993-10-26· cited 7×
• Rhymer v. State
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 1994-01-20· cited 1×
• Kristine Bunch v. State of Indiana
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2012-03-21
• Darius Shawtee McNary v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2020-08-21

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• United States v. Agurs
  Supreme Court· 1976-06-24· cited 6,537×
• Loyd v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1980-01-11· cited 405×
• Reed v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1985-06-25· cited 37×
• Augustine v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1984-04-02· cited 16×
• Moredock v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1982-12-03· cited 13×
• Taylor v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1971-03-05· cited 13×
• Newell v. Walker
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 1985-06-12· cited 7×