Fraenkl v. Cerecedo Hermanos
Citations
- 216 U.S. 295
- 30 S. Ct. 322
- 54 L. Ed. 486
- 1910 U.S. LEXIS 1892
Syllabus
<p>• Where a bill of review is presented for filing within the period allowed, . and the court delays passing upon the application until after that 'period has elapsed, the time between tendering the bill for filing and permission given to file is not counted in applying the limitation. Ensminger v. Powers, IOS U. S. 292.</p> <p>Jurisdiction is determined as of the time of commencement of the suit, and éven though the jurisdiction of the court be enlarged by asub-s'equent statute so as to include the parties, the court cannot acquire jurisdiction against objection.</p> <p>After a case has been decided below without reference to any Federal question part ies may not for purpose of review by this court inject a Federal question by the suggestion that a 1 ederal right was relied on.</p>
Judges: White
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
6 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Swift & Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1928-03-19· cited 410×
- Continental Oil Co. v. Osage Oil & Refining Co.Tenth Circuit· 1932-03-14· cited 7×
- Zewadski v. BarksdaleSupreme Court of Florida· 1923-12-17· cited 6×
- Colburn v. WhitneyHawaii Supreme Court· 1915-11-08· cited 4×
- Richard v. National City BankS.D. New York· 1934-02-20· cited 4×
- United States v. ChusedEighth Circuit· 1954-01-28· cited 1×
Cites
2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.