Skip to main content
D. Massachusetts· 11/18/2005

Fox v. Lappin

Citations

  • 441 F. Supp. 2d 203
  • 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 43072
  • 2005 WL 4541943

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “Notification claims do not relate to the fact or duration of confinement, therefore challenge to a notification requirement is not properly brought as a habeas petition.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Young

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

1 case in this archive cites this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.