· 1/17/2006
Fox v. Lappin
Citations
- 409 F. Supp. 2d 79
- 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1141
- 2006 WL 120212
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that “judicial review of individual determinations under those statutes governing inmate placement, transfer, release and early release . . . is precluded under section 706 of the APA”
- noting that the classification procedures were established “for purposes of inmate placement”
- “The statute governing pre-release custody also fails to create a liberty interest in the transfer to a less restrictive environment”
- BOP did not abuse its discretion in applying a “Sex Offender” classification to an inmate with a prior conviction for a sexual offense
- “[A]ssignment of a “Sex Offender” Safety Factor to prisoners with prior state sex offenses cannot be found contrary to the statute or congressional intent”
- “[c]lassification of inmates is a matter within the discretion of prison officials”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Young
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.