Skip to main content
· 1/17/2006

Fox v. Lappin

Citations

  • 409 F. Supp. 2d 79
  • 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1141
  • 2006 WL 120212

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that “judicial review of individual determinations under those statutes governing inmate placement, transfer, release and early release . . . is precluded under section 706 of the APA”
  • noting that the classification procedures were established “for purposes of inmate placement”
  • “The statute governing pre-release custody also fails to create a liberty interest in the transfer to a less restrictive environment”
  • BOP did not abuse its discretion in applying a “Sex Offender” classification to an inmate with a prior conviction for a sexual offense
  • “[A]ssignment of a “Sex Offender” Safety Factor to prisoners with prior state sex offenses cannot be found contrary to the statute or congressional intent”
  • “[c]lassification of inmates is a matter within the discretion of prison officials”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Young

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.