Massachusetts Appeals Court· 11/14/1996

Fox v. F & J Gattozzi Corp.

Citations

41 Mass. App. Ct. 581
672 N.E.2d 547

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that plaintiff had presented sufficient evidence to sustain causes of action for contract and unjust enrichment, but granting defendant’s motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict on the unjust enrichment, since otherwise there would have been a duplicative, recovery
explaining that negligent misrepresentation applies to false information between parties of business transaction
finding a grant of summary judgment to employer improper where employee advanced a neg ligent misrepresentation claim based on employer’s withholding of critical information relating to employees’ retirement benefits
oral agreement for payment of retirement benefits until death of employee enforceable under the statute because the employee could die in less than one year
unjust enrichment claim duplicative when plaintiff had prevailed on breach of contract claim
requiring “justifiable” reliance by the plaintiff

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Smith

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

77 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.