Skip to main content
· 7/16/1998

Daniel F. BRENNAN, Plaintiff, Appellant, v. GTE GOVERNMENT SYSTEMS CORPORATION, Defendant, Appellee

Citations

  • 150 F.3d 21
  • 1998 U.S. App. LEXIS 16269
  • 74 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 45,627
  • 77 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 430
  • 1998 WL 387405

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that the fourth prong was satisfied where the plaintiff provided raw data indicating that the defendant preferred younger employees
  • finding that evidence company deviated from standard procedure that resulted in plaintiff’s termination demonstrated pretext
  • affirming 2 approval of settlement when there was “no evidence to suggest that the settlement was 3 negotiated in haste or in the absence of information illuminating the value of plaintiffs’ 4 claims”
  • sufficient evidence of meeting legitimate job expectations consisted of acceptable rankings in employment reviews and positive comments
  • “Adequate notice is critical to court approval of a class settlement 5 under Rule 23(e).”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Torruella, Coffin, Bownes

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.