Skip to main content

Foster v. Leggett

Citations

  • 484 S.W.2d 827
  • 1972 Ky. LEXIS 149

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that Kentucky law applied to a case involving the death of a Kentucky resident in a car accident despite the fact that the tortfeasor was domiciled in Ohio and the fatal accident occurred in Ohio
  • finding that “if there are significant contacts—not necessarily the most significant contacts—with Kentucky, the Kentucky law should be applied”
  • applying Kentucky law because of significant contacts, including the fact that the route started in Kentucky, a passenger was a resident of Kentucky, and the driver had contacts with Kentucky, including renting a room and working in Kentucky
  • “When the court has jurisdiction of the parties its primary responsibility is to follow its own substantive law. The basic law is the law of the forum, which should not be displaced without valid reasons.”
  • also noting ..Kentucky's “egocentric” approach to choice of law questions
  • that a Kentucky resident was involved in a car accident which occurred in 1 The Sixth Circuit routinely recognizes Kentucky’s “provincial tendency” when applying Kentucky's choice-of-law rules. See, e.g., Wallace Hardware Co. v Abrams, 223 F.3d 382, 391 (6th Cir. 2000

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Walden, Steinfeld, Hill, Pal-More, Neikirk, Osborne, Milliken

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

38 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.