Skip to main content

Foster v. Hill

Citations

  • 275 S.W.3d 151
  • 372 Ark. 263
  • 2008 Ark. LEXIS 87

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the concurrent jurisdiction rule was one ground for granting a writ of | ,scertiorari preventing a division of the Circuit Court of Crittenden County from acting on a matter, over which a coordinate division had already exercised jurisdiction
  • a judge in a different division in the circuit may act in the absence of the judge handling the case

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Jim Hannah

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

15 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.