New York Court of Appeals· 3/26/1996
Foster v. Churchill
Citations
- 665 N.E.2d 153
- 87 N.Y.2d 744
- 642 N.Y.S.2d 583
- 1996 N.Y. LEXIS 302
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that acts in furtherance of an economic interest defeat claims for tortious interference with a contract
- concluding that defense applied where the defendants, who were founders and stockholders of breaching company, “were clearly acting in the economic interest” of the company “to preserve [its] financial health” prior to insolvency
- explaining that interference with a contract can be justified by “economic interest” unless “there is a showing of malice or illegality”
- sustaining economic justification defense where lack of good faith did not rise to the level of “independent torts”
- applying the economic interest defense where defendant was a significant stockholder in the breaching party’s business
- “procuring the breach of a contract in the exercise of equal or superior right is acting with just cause or excuse and is justification for what would otherwise be an actionable wrong.” (internal quotations omitted)
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Smith
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
195 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Dillon v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1999-12-14· cited 509×
- NBT Bancorp Inc. v. Fleet/Norstar Financial Group, Inc.New York Court of Appeals· 1996-03-26· cited 284×
- Rich v. Fox News Network, LLCSecond Circuit· 2019-09-13· cited 149×
- Elias v. Rolling Stone LLCSecond Circuit· 2017-04-27· cited 145×
- Tannerite Sports, LLC v. NBCUniversal News GroupSecond Circuit· 2017-07-25· cited 143×
- Town of Massena v. Healthcare Underwriters Mutual InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals· 2002-09-17· cited 136×
- White Plains Coat & Apron Co. v. Cintas Corp.New York Court of Appeals· 2007-04-26· cited 106×
- Stepanov v. Dow Jones & Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2014-05-29· cited 89×
- Pure Power Boot Camp, Inc. v. Warrior Fitness Boot Camp, LLCS.D. New York· 2011-09-12· cited 76×
- IMG FRAGRANCE BRANDS, LLC v. Houbigant, Inc.S.D. New York· 2009-12-18· cited 75×
- White Plains Coat & Apron Co., Inc. v. Cintas Corp. And Cintas Corp. 2, Docket No. 05-1520-CvSecond Circuit· 2006-08-15· cited 73×
- William Kaufman Organization, Ltd. v. Graham & James L. L. P.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2000-02-08· cited 72×
- Joan Hansen & Co. v. Everlast World's Boxing Headquarters Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2002-06-27· cited 64×
- Thomas H. v. Paul B.New York Court of Appeals· 2012-02-21· cited 62×
- ESI, Inc. v. Coastal Power Production Co.S.D. New York· 1998-03-02· cited 60×
- Fuji Photo Film U.S.A., Inc. v. McNultyS.D. New York· 2009-11-04· cited 53×
- ESI, Inc. v. Coastal Corp.S.D. New York· 1999-08-31· cited 48×
- Thai v. Cayre Group, Ltd.S.D. New York· 2010-07-08· cited 46×
- CBS Corp. v. DumsdayAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2000-01-25· cited 39×
- Sexter & Warmflash, P.C. v. MargrabeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2007-01-04· cited 38×
Other cases named Foster v. Churchill
1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.