Thai v. Cayre Group, Ltd.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• denying leave to amend where there was “no additional substantive information [plaintiff] could offer to cure the deficient pleadings with respect to her ... claim’
• explaining the analytical confusion that persisted over Swierkiewicz in the wake of Twombly and Iqbal
• denying leave to amend where there was “no additional substantive information [plaintiff] could offer to cure the deficient pleadings with respect to her. . . claim’’
• denying leave to amend where there was “no additional substantive information [plaintiff] could offer to cure the deficient pleadings with respect to her . . . claim’’
• eon-clusory allegations, or charges based on “surmise, conjecture; and suspicion” are insufficient to defeat common interest privilege
• “A defamation claim is only sufficient if it adequately identifies the purported communication.” (internal quotation marks omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).