Ninth Circuit· 4/2/2003
Forum Insurance v. Comparet
Citations
- 62 F. App'x 151
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that plaintiffs civil conspiracy claim was barred by section 3439.09(c)
- “California allows for a cause of action for conspiracy to commit fraudulent transfers, and allows a plaintiff to recover legal damages on such a cause of action.”
- “[W]e find that CAL. CIV. CODE § 3439.09(c) is a -11- 1 statute of repose pertaining to all actions relating to fraudulent 2 transfers.”
- “[W]e find that CAL. CIV. CODE § 3439.09(c) is a -11- 1 statute of repose pertaining to all actions relating to fraudulent 2 transfers.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Jorgenson, Pregerson, Thomas
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
5 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Pga W. Residential Ass'n, Inc. v. Hulven Int'l, Inc.California Court of Appeals, 5th District· 2017-08-09· cited 48×
- Rund v. Bank of America Corp. (In re EPD Investment Co.)Ninth Circuit· 2015-01-07· cited 33×
- Donell v. KeppersS.D. California· 2011-12-06· cited 24×
- In re: Epd Investment Company, LLC and Jerrold S. PressmanNinth Circuit· 2015-01-07
- PGA West Residential Assn. v. Hulven InternationalCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2017-08-23
Cites
9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Wyatt v. Union Mortgage Co.California Supreme Court· 1979-08-10· cited 244×
- Kidron v. Movie Acquisition Corp.California Court of Appeal· 1995-12-13· cited 142×
- Transmission Agency of Northern California v. Sierra Pacific Power Company, Bonneville Power Administration, Pacificorp, and Portland General ElectricNinth Circuit· 2002-07-08· cited 109×
- Monastra v. Konica Business MacHines, U.S.A., Inc.California Court of Appeal· 1996-03-28· cited 45×
- Taylor v. S & M Lamp Co.California Court of Appeal· 1961-03-30· cited 37×
- MacEdo v. BosioCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2001-01-10· cited 32×
- Hickson v. ThielmanCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1956-12-17· cited 27×
- Giest v. Sequoia Ventures, Inc.California Court of Appeal· 2000-08-24· cited 25×
- Flowers & Sons Development Corp. v. Municipal CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1978-11-29· cited 14×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.