Skip to main content

Fortson v. State

Citations

  • 869 S.E.2d 432
  • 313 Ga. 203

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that “[a]ny challenge as to the sufficiency of the evidence” relating to convictions that merged or were vacated by operation of law was moot
  • even though the defendant did not personally shoot victim and take his cell phone, the jury could reasonably conclude from the evidence that the defendant participated in the armed robbery and was therefore party to the crime

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

20 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.