Forehand v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• evidence that defendant was coherent and understood his rights was sufficient to sustain the trial court’s finding that his statement was voluntary, notwithstanding his alleged intoxication
• “intoxication, standing alone, does not render a statement inadmissible. If the evidence is sufficient to establish that the defendant’s statement was the product of rational intellect and free will, it may be admitted even if the defendant was intoxicated when he made the statement.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Rowland v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 2019-06-03· cited 35×
• Duran v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2005-08-03· cited 22×
• Boggs v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2010-06-30· cited 13×
• State v. Floyd
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2010-10-13· cited 8×
• Walker v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2009-09-17

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Willis v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 1993-11-01· cited 43×
• Mullinax v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 1986-02-18· cited 36×
• Mullis v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 1981-09-30· cited 34×
• Horton v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 1988-09-07· cited 29×
• Strickland v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 1983-02-23· cited 28×
• Carter v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 1987-10-21· cited 27×
• Cunningham v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 1986-04-23· cited 13×
• Screws v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2000-08-24· cited 11×
• Powell v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1991-09-12· cited 5×
• Hemidi v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2000-07-28· cited 4×
• Mickens v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1986-02-17· cited 3×