Skip to main content

Ford v. Whipple

Citations

  • 483 S.E.2d 591
  • 225 Ga. App. 276
  • 97 Fulton County D. Rep. 633
  • 1997 Ga. App. LEXIS 180

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that malicious conduct directed toward any person conceivably in the path of the defendant motorist also was not sufficiently directed toward the plaintiff in order to allow a cause of action under the exception
  • impact rule foreclosed recovery by uninjured child passenger for fright and apprehension absent any physical injury
  • impact rule foreclosed recovery by uninjured child passenger for fright and apprehension absent any physical injury
  • “[disregard of general consequences is a part of wanton behavior but... the wantonness must be directed to the plaintiff”
  • “Disregard of general consequences is a part of wanton behavior, but the exception to the impact rule requires more; the wantonness must be directed to the plaintiff.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Andrews, Beasley, Blackburn, Eldridge, Johnson, McMurray, Pope, Ruffin, Smith

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

16 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

37 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.