Skip to main content

Ford v. State

Citations

  • 386 N.E.2d 709
  • 179 Ind. App. 535

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that even if counsel’s inability to address the court on defendant’s behalf at sentencing was a violation of defendant’s right to counsel, it did not prejudice the defendant because his sentence was mandated by statute
  • holding that even if counsel’s inability to address the court on defendant’s behalf at sentencing was a violation of defendant’s right to counsel, it did not prejudice the defendant because his sentence was mandated by statute

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Staton, Hoffman, Garrard

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.