Indiana Supreme Court· 6/3/1976

Gurley v. State

Citations

348 N.E.2d 16
264 Ind. 552
1976 Ind. LEXIS 492

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

noting that while reversal was appropriate in Aubrey because the court refused an instruction to which the petitioner was entitled, reversal was not appropriate in Gurley because the petitioner did not request an instruction and the court is not required to give one sua sponte
noting that while reversal was appropriate in Aubrey because the court refused an instruction to which the petitioner was entitled, reversal was not appropriate in Gurley because the petitioner did not request an instruction and the court is not required to give one sua sponte

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Prentice, Givan, Arterburn, Hunter, De-Bruler

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

25 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.