Ford v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that if initial detention is illegal, State must prove by clear and convincing evidence \that there has been an unequivocal break in the chain of illegality sufficient to dissipate the taint\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Hankerson
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2011-06-30· cited 34×
• Huffman v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2006-08-24· cited 17×
• Walker v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2003-05-30· cited 12×
• Chaney v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2007-05-16· cited 8×
• Oslin v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2005-10-14· cited 6×
• Jacoby v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2003-08-13· cited 5×
• J.H., A CHILD v. STATE OF FLORIDA
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2018-10-31
• Keller v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2011-10-12
• Mathis v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2009-04-08

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Miranda v. Arizona
  Supreme Court· 1966-06-13· cited 58,288×
• Alabama v. White
  Supreme Court· 1990-06-11· cited 3,282×
• Florida v. JL
  Supreme Court· 2000-03-28· cited 1,350×
• Popple v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1993-10-14· cited 417×
• J.L. v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1998-12-17· cited 64×
• State v. Anderson
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1992-01-02· cited 32×
• Burnette v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1995-08-04· cited 28×
• Jordan v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1998-02-06· cited 18×
• State v. Saums
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1994-03-11· cited 1×