Skip to main content

Foley v. Commonwealth

Citations

  • 379 S.E.2d 915
  • 8 Va. App. 149
  • 5 Va. Law Rep. 2449
  • 1989 Va. App. LEXIS 43

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • defining and discussing the present sense impression “sub-rule” of the original res gestae exception
  • “[A] trial court in its discretion may allow the Commonwealth to present rebuttal evidence even when it would have been more appropriately introduced as part of the case-in-chief’
  • \[A] trial court in its discretion may allow the Commonwealth to present rebuttal evidence even when it would have been more appropriately introduced as part of the case-in-chief\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Koontz, Moon

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

19 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

21 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.