Skip to main content
· 9/6/1989

Fogler v. Flindall (In Re Flindall)

Citations

  • 105 B.R. 32
  • 1989 Bankr. LEXIS 1517
  • 1989 WL 103234

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • state exemption statute was not preempted as it was not “related to” ERISA within the meaning of 29 U.S.C. section 1144(a)
  • state exemption statute was not preempted as it was not “related to” ERISA within the meaning of 29 U.S.C. section 1144(a)
  • state exemption statute was not preempted as it was not “related to” ERISA within the meaning of 29 U.S.C. section 1144(a)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Robert G. Mooreman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.