Skip to main content
· 12/3/1973

Foggy v. Eyman

Citations

  • 516 P.2d 321
  • 110 Ariz. 185
  • 1973 Ariz. LEXIS 469

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “The trial court had jurisdiction to hear the [defendant’s petition for writ of habeas corpus challenging the parole board’s conduct] despite the apparent mislabeling of the nature of relief requested as habeas corpus.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cameron, Hays, Struckmeyer, Lockwood, Holohan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.