Sheppard v. Arizona Board of Pardons and Paroles

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• considering whether superior court could exercise special action jurisdiction over constitutional claim after plaintiff mistakenly alleged jurisdiction under the Act
• “[O]fficial actions of the [board of pardons and paroles] are not, generally, subject to judicial review.”
• “[T]his Court will consider any application ‘which states sufficient facts to justify relief irrespective of its technical denomination.’” (quoting State v. Superior Court, 103 Ariz. 208, 210 (1968))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).