Skip to main content
S.D. New York· 8/4/2009

Fogarazzo v. Lehman Bros.

Citations

  • 263 F.R.D. 90
  • 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 67555
  • 2009 WL 2390244

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • expressing skepticism regarding an expert's use of control periods that had been affected by the defendants' challenged conduct
  • Rule 23 requires proof that loss causation “may be proven class-wide, which may be shown by proposing a suitable methodology”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Scheindlin

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

20 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

39 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.