Skip to main content
· 3/10/1976

Fmc Corporation v. Russell E. Train

Citations

  • 539 F.2d 973
  • 6 Envtl. L. Rep. (Envtl. Law Inst.) 20382
  • 8 ERC (BNA) 1731
  • 1976 U.S. App. LEXIS 12453

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • the estimation of BPT costs should not serve as a dilatory device, obstructing the Agency from proceeding with its primary mission of cleaning up the lakes, rivers, and streams of this nation
  • failure to disclose flow figures used to compute poundage standard requires remand
  • unsupported as sumptions of waste water flow

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Rives, Breitenstein, Widener

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.