Chemical Manufacturers Association v. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, No. 87-4849

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that new data was “edited in the same manner” as the older data and was used to merely update preexisting database
• upholding limitations not originally specifically proposed by the EPA because they were a logical outgrowth of notice and comments
• upholding limitations not originally specifically proposed by the EPA because they were a logical outgrowth of notice and comments
• labeling CWA §§ 301, 304, 306, 308, 402, 501, and 502 as EPA's legal authority for the Final Rule
• labeling CWA §§ 301, 304, 306, 308, 402, 501, and 502 as EPA's legal authority for the Final Rule
• upholding BAT where 14% of facilities would be forced to close

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).