Skip to main content

Floyd v. State

Citations

  • 427 S.E.2d 605
  • 207 Ga. App. 275
  • 93 Fulton County D. Rep. 544
  • 1993 Ga. App. LEXIS 151

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • where we concluded that a garden center contiguous to a store was part of the store’s main building
  • “It is a reasonable inference that, as the driver, [the defendant] was in control of the vehicle and had knowledge of its contents.”
  • “It 6 is a reasonable inference that, as the driver, [the defendant] was in control of the vehicle and had knowledge of its contents.”
  • appellant retained a truck when the keys were found in his trousers
  • evidence showing entry into garden center was sufficient to sustain conviction for burglary under former version of OCGA § 16-7-1, which defined burglary as including an unlawful entry with intent to commit a theft into not only “the dwelling of another” but also “any other building”
  • evidence showing entry into garden center was sufficient to sustain conviction for burglary under former version of OCGA § 16-7-1, which defined burglary as including an unlawful entry with intent to commit a theft into not only “the dwelling of another” but also “any other building”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Blackburn, McMurray, Cooper

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

12 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.