· 10/31/2000
Redfern v. State
Citations
- 540 S.E.2d 701
- 246 Ga. App. 572
- 2000 Fulton County D. Rep. 4374
- 2000 Ga. App. LEXIS 1297
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding that the broad meaning given to the term “building” under the burglary statute did not encompass a 2,000-foot-high broadcast tower
- purpose of tower was to provide a tall structure from which the television broadcast signal could emanate, not to provide shelter
- 2,000-foot-high television broadcast tower was not a “building” within the meaning of the burglary statute because the purpose of the tower was to provide a tall structure from which the broadcast signal could emanate, not to provide shelter for people, animals, or goods
- TV tower not a building under the statute
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Andrews, Ruffin, Ellington
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.