Skip to main content
· 10/31/2000

Redfern v. State

Citations

  • 540 S.E.2d 701
  • 246 Ga. App. 572
  • 2000 Fulton County D. Rep. 4374
  • 2000 Ga. App. LEXIS 1297

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that the broad meaning given to the term “building” under the burglary statute did not encompass a 2,000-foot-high broadcast tower
  • purpose of tower was to provide a tall structure from which the television broadcast signal could emanate, not to provide shelter
  • 2,000-foot-high television broadcast tower was not a “building” within the meaning of the burglary statute because the purpose of the tower was to provide a tall structure from which the broadcast signal could emanate, not to provide shelter for people, animals, or goods
  • TV tower not a building under the statute

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Andrews, Ruffin, Ellington

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.