Skip to main content

Flowers v. State

Citations

  • 59 Fla. 16

Syllabus

<p>1. An objection that evidence was hearsay, will not avail, when the party making the remark was immediately placed upon the stand and testified thereto.</p> <p>2. Upon trial of two jointly indicted the impeachment of one testifying affects his evidence as to both.</p> <p>3. A charge defining larceny as a “taking and carrying” omitting the word “away” is harmless when the asportation is admitted.</p> <p>4. A judgment on an information for larceny of a mortgage will not be arrested for failure to allege an acknowledgment, when an acknowledgment is not necessary to the validity of the mortgage.</p> <p>5. The omission of the word dollars in stating the value of a mortgage stolen should not arrest the judgment where the identical figures with the word added is given in the information as the consideration for the mortgage.</p> <p>6. The evidence supports the verdict.</p>

Judges: Cockrell, Hocker, Parkhill, Shackleford, Taylor, Whitfield

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

1 case in this archive is cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.