Flowers v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• disagreeing with Byrum and noting that “zero plus one equals one reflects an addition process to us”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Flowers v. State
  Court of Appeals of Texas· 1994-12-22· cited 7×
• Rose v. State
  Court of Appeals of Texas· 1991-03-14· cited 6×
• Flowers v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1992-12-09· cited 6×
• Coffin v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 8th Dist. (El Paso)· 1993-02-17· cited 5×
• Ward v. State
  Court of Appeals of Texas· 1991-01-23· cited 1×
• Vandamme Jeanty v. the State of Texas
  Tex. App. Ct., 2nd Dist. (Fort Worth)· 2023-04-27

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• United States v. Harriss
  Supreme Court· 1954-06-07· cited 1,827×
• Earls v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1986-04-09· cited 345×
• Adams v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1986-02-05· cited 324×
• McManus v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1979-12-05· cited 193×
• Silva v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 13th Dist.· 1982-09-15· cited 40×
• Byrum v. State
  Court of Appeals of Texas· 1988-12-01· cited 26×
• Araiza v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1977-09-21· cited 14×
• Wells v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1979-02-14· cited 13×
• Walker v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1979-11-14· cited 7×
• Sonnier v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 9th Dist. (Beaumont)· 1989-01-11· cited 3×
• Talamentez v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1933-05-03· cited 2×
• King v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1961-03-29· cited 1×