Flournoy v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Flournoy’s request for self-representation was unequivocal; consequently, the trial court’s failure to hold a Faretta hearing resulted in per se reversible error, and our review is not amenable to a harmless error analysis.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Herron v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2012-02-17· cited 5×
• Betts v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2015-01-30· cited 3×
• Combs v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2014-02-14· cited 3×

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Faretta v. California
  Supreme Court· 1975-06-30· cited 11,585×
• Indiana v. Edwards
  Supreme Court· 2008-06-19· cited 1,118×
• Tennis v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2008-12-11· cited 60×
• State v. Young
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1993-10-28· cited 52×
• Goldsmith v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2006-09-29· cited 10×