Skip to main content
S.D. New York· 7/22/2013

Florio v. Canty

Citations

  • 954 F. Supp. 2d 227
  • 2013 WL 3781549
  • 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 102064

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that two instances of confinement in cells with overflowing toilets and being forced to walk through ankle-high human waste was “simply too minor to state an Eighth Amendment claim”
  • “[E]xposure to... waste [that is] intermittent or limited to a matter of hours” generally does not violate the Eighth Amendment
  • “A Section 1983 claim will not le for prison conditions that are merely unpleasant. However, chronic exposure to human waste will give rise to a colorable claim.”
  • inmate failed to state Eighth amendment claims when he was “exposed to waste only for brief periods; it appears that his total exposure was less than a few hours”
  • inmate failed to state Eighth amendment claims when he was “exposed to waste only for brief periods; it appears that his total exposure was less than a few hours”
  • inmate failed to state Eighth amendment claims when he was “exposed to waste only for brief periods; it appears that his total exposure was less than a few hours”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Peck

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

48 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.