Florida Telephone Corp. v. Essig

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that contractual provision granted defendant privilege to interfere, even if defendant was motivated by malicious intent
• defendant not liable for exercising its contractual right to forbid its contractor from hiring a particular subcontractor for the defendant’s projects
• when contract expressly reserved to defendant right to promptly remove subcontractors’ employees from job, defendant was privileged to inter- fere with subcontractor’s relationship with general con- tractor, regardless of motive

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).