Flores v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• where the defendant requested a continuance, but only because the state failed to produce discovery material, the clock will not be tolled

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Ross v. State
  Mississippi Supreme Court· 1992-07-22· cited 51×
• Beckwith v. State
  Mississippi Supreme Court· 1992-12-16· cited 46×
• Spencer v. State
  Mississippi Supreme Court· 1991-12-31· cited 44×
• Winder v. State
  Mississippi Supreme Court· 1994-06-30· cited 23×
• Ford v. State
  Mississippi Supreme Court· 1991-11-13· cited 14×
• Towner v. MOORE EX REL. QUITMAN CTY. SCH. DIST.
  Mississippi Supreme Court· 1992-07-22· cited 3×
• Towner v. Moore ex rel. Quitman County School District
  Mississippi Supreme Court· 1992-07-22· cited 3×

Cites

14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Barker v. Wingo
  Supreme Court· 1972-06-22· cited 12,108×
• Newell v. State
  Mississippi Supreme Court· 1975-01-27· cited 242×
• Vickery v. State
  Mississippi Supreme Court· 1988-11-30· cited 160×
• Perry v. State
  Mississippi Supreme Court· 1982-09-08· cited 130×
• State v. Clemente
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1974-07-02· cited 117×
• Flores v. State
  Mississippi Supreme Court· 1990-12-19· cited 103×
• Hall v. State
  Mississippi Supreme Court· 1989-02-09· cited 91×
• Bailey v. State
  Mississippi Supreme Court· 1985-01-30· cited 80×
• Kinzey v. State
  Mississippi Supreme Court· 1986-11-19· cited 64×
• Turner v. State
  Mississippi Supreme Court· 1980-04-23· cited 61×
• Payne v. State
  Mississippi Supreme Court· 1978-10-04· cited 26×
• Southern Pacific Lumber Company v. Reynolds
  Mississippi Supreme Court· 1968-01-29· cited 25×
• Hudspeth v. State Highway Com'n
  Mississippi Supreme Court· 1988-11-16· cited 17×
• Yarber v. State
  Mississippi Supreme Court· 1990-12-19· cited 14×