Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 5/29/1985
Flores v. State
Citations
- 690 S.W.2d 281
- 1985 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 1396
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding murder should have been class=Section4> anticipated as a possible result of burglary where appellant knew companion had a gun
- holding evidence was legally sufficient to support defendant = s conviction when co-defendant = s shooting of complainant who came home during burglary was committed in furtherance of burglary
- concluding evidence was sufficient to support capital murder conviction because appellant conspired to burglarize a home, decedent was shot during the furtherance of the burglary, and appellant knew his co-defendant had a gun and should have anticipated the shooting
- noting defendant could have anticipated victim being shot in furtherance of conspiracy to commit burglary because defendant knew co-conspirator had a gun
- noting defendant could have anticipated victim being shot in furtherance of conspiracy to commit burglary because defendant knew co-conspirator had a gun
- murder should have been anticipated as possible result of burglary, where appellant knew accomplice had a gun
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: White, Onion, Teague
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
64 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Leday v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1998-12-16· cited 1,256×
- Ex Parte CruzCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1987-10-28· cited 302×
- Barnes v. StateTex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 2001-11-29· cited 126×
- Reyes v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1987-11-04· cited 94×
- Fann v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1986-01-29· cited 80×
- Tippitt v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas· 2001-03-15· cited 78×
- Umoja v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1998-04-16· cited 70×
- Hooper v. StateTex. App. Ct., 10th Dist. (Waco)· 2008-03-12· cited 63×
- Hooks v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1993-06-09· cited 60×
- Johnson v. StateTex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 1999-11-04· cited 56×
- Campbell v. StateTex. App. Ct., 10th Dist. (Waco)· 1995-03-15· cited 49×
- Crum v. StateTex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 1997-04-24· cited 47×
- Wynn v. StateTex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 1993-05-05· cited 44×
- Hall v. StateTex. App. Ct., 6th Dist. (Texarkana)· 1997-04-09· cited 43×
- Theadric Lee v. StateTex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 2013-12-19· cited 37×
- Brown v. StateTex. App. Ct., 11th Dist. (Eastland)· 2002-08-15· cited 29×
- Broden v. StateTex. App. Ct., 7th Dist. (Amarillo)· 1996-05-21· cited 27×
- Ex Parte AdkinsCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1989-04-05· cited 26×
- Patterson v. StateTex. App. Ct., 5th Dist. (Dallas)· 1997-07-24· cited 23×
- Adams v. StateTex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 2000-12-28· cited 17×
Cites
10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Polk v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1985-05-22· cited 460×
- Barecky v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1982-10-20· cited 80×
- Travelstead v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1985-05-22· cited 75×
- Ex Parte MoserCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1980-03-05· cited 70×
- Ex Parte ThomasCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1982-09-22· cited 67×
- Flores v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1984-11-21· cited 32×
- Ruben v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1983-02-09· cited 29×
- Ex Parte HopsonCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1985-04-17· cited 11×
- Ex Parte NinoCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1983-11-02· cited 8×
- Ex parte LaraCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1985-05-22· cited 4×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.