Skip to main content

Flores v. State

Citations

  • 681 S.W.2d 94

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that murder should have been anticipated because the defendant knew his co-conspirator brought a gun to the burglary
  • holding murder should have been anticipated as a possible result of burglary where appellant knew companion had a gun
  • holding murder should have been anticipated as a possible result of burglary when appellant knew companion had a gun
  • holding burglary conspirator should have anticipated shooting of complainant when he knew co-conspirator had gun
  • holding murder should have been anticipated as a possible result of burglary, where appellant knew accomplice had a gun

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Brown, Cannon, Draughn

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

27 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.