Skip to main content

Flores v. State

Citations

  • 965 P.2d 901
  • 114 Nev. 910
  • 1998 Nev. LEXIS 112

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • setting forth safeguards for the trial court's exercise of its discretion concerning juror questions, including that questions be factual in nature
  • “[W]e join the majority of jurisdictions which acknowledge the practice of jury-questioning as an innovation that can significantly enhance the truth-seeking function of the trial process.”
  • juror questions are subject to the same rules of evidence governing questioning by attorneys
  • \[O]nly questions permissible under the rules of evidence will be asked.\
  • “We hold that allowing juror-inspired questions in a criminal case is not prejudicial per se, but is a matter committed to the sound discretion of the trial court. To minimize the risk of prejudice ... the practice must be carefully controlled by the court.” (Citation omitted.)
  • reviewing the allowance of jury questions under an abuse-of-discretion standard

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Per Curiam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

13 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.