Fletcher v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Absent evidence that the item taken was a family heirloom or a new automobile, for which fair market value would not adequately compensate the victim, fair market value is the valuation method to be used.”
• “In arriving at fair market value, the trial court must first consider the ‘original market cost’ of the stolen item, which was $1500 here. Accordingly, the $4500- $6000 retail cost of the watch [at the time it was purchased] was irrelevant.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Aboyoun v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2003-04-09· cited 15×
• Molter v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2004-11-17· cited 9×
• J.F.H. v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2003-07-18· cited 7×
• G.M.H. v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2009-10-09· cited 3×
• CRICKET KATHLEEN TOOLE v. STATE OF FLORIDA
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2019-02-20· cited 2×
• E.D.P. v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2009-03-06· cited 2×
• JFH v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2003-07-18
• EDP v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2009-03-06

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Hawthorne
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1991-01-03· cited 121×
• Domaceti v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1993-04-14· cited 22×
• Bakos v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1997-09-17· cited 12×