E.D. Pennsylvania· 6/12/2006
Fledderman v. Glunk (In Re Glunk)
Citations
- 343 B.R. 754
- 2006 WL 1593989
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- remanding the State Court Action after Dr. Glunk removed it to this court
- finding “[w]hether or not the Plaintiffs asserted a timely fraud claim in the underlying state litigation bears no significance in the bankruptcy court’s ultimate determination of the nature of the debt and whether such debt is dischargeable pursuant to § 523(a)(2)(A)”
- expiration of statute of limitations for fraud does not (5) There is a clear and convincing need for a new determination of the issue (a
- complaints under § 523(a)(2)(A) are governed by the heightened pleading requirements of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 9(b)
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Eric L. Frank
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
9 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Strominger v. Giquinto (In Re Giquinto)E.D. Pennsylvania· 2008-06-13· cited 58×
- GMAC Inc. v. Coley (In Re Coley)E.D. Pennsylvania· 2010-07-29· cited 54×
- Giansante & Cobb, LLC v. Singh (In Re Singh)E.D. Pennsylvania· 2010-06-25· cited 37×
- Jou v. Adalian (In re Adalian)M.D. Pennsylvania· 2012-06-07· cited 36×
- Symonies v. Sobol (In re Sobol)M.D. Pennsylvania· 2016-02-08· cited 15×
- Fledderman v. Glunk (In Re Glunk)E.D. Pennsylvania· 2011-08-11· cited 9×
- Davis v. Rickabaugh (Rickabaugh)S.D. Iowa· 2006-09-28· cited 5×
- Hydock v. Schermer (In Re Schermer)E.D. Pennsylvania· 2008-04-03· cited 2×
- Hackerman v. Demeza (In re Demeza)M.D. Pennsylvania· 2017-07-28· cited 2×
Cites
22 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Hishon v. King & SpaldingSupreme Court· 1984-05-22· cited 5,292×
- Kehr Packages, Inc. v. Fidelcor, Inc.Third Circuit· 1991-03-06· cited 1,043×
- Cohen v. De La CruzSupreme Court· 1998-03-24· cited 919×
- Sturm v. ClarkThird Circuit· 1987-12-14· cited 142×
- In Re Robert Z. Gergely, Debtor. Jordan Alexander Lee-Benner, a Minor, by and Through His Guardian Ad Litem, Karen Mills v. Robert Z. GergelyNinth Circuit· 1997-04-09· cited 59×
- Walnut Associates v. SaidelE.D. Pennsylvania· 1994-02-23· cited 43×
- Charell v. Gonzalez (In Re Gonzalez)S.D. New York· 1999-11-18· cited 31×
- Webber v. Giarratano (In Re Giarratano)D. Delaware· 2003-09-03· cited 29×
- Spinnenweber v. Moran (In Re Moran)S.D. Ohio· 1993-03-08· cited 26×
- Doug Grant, Inc. v. Greate Bay Casino Corp.Supreme Court· 2001-05-21· cited 25×
- Caruso v. Segal (In Re Segal)E.D. Pennsylvania· 1996-05-03· cited 20×
- Nunnery v. Rountree (In Re Rountree)E.D. Virginia· 2004-12-27· cited 18×
- American Express Travel Related Services Co. v. HeneinE.D. New York· 2001-01-18· cited 15×
- Gill Distribution Centers, Inc. v. Banks (In Re Banks)C.D. California· 1998-10-07· cited 15×
- Hanft v. Church (In Re Hanft)S.D. Florida· 2002-09-10· cited 14×
- Harmon v. Scott (In Re Scott)E.D. Virginia· 1996-06-25· cited 14×
- Shaw v. Santos (In Re Santos)D. New Jersey· 2004-02-02· cited 10×
- Michener v. Brady (In Re Brady)E.D. Pennsylvania· 2000-01-13· cited 9×
- Parker v. Bruner (In Re Bruner)E.D. Missouri· 1984-04-23· cited 8×
- Marra v. Kroen (In Re Kroen)D. New Jersey· 2002-07-18· cited 7×
Other cases named Fledderman v. Glunk (In Re Glunk)
1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.