Skip to main content
E.D. Pennsylvania· 6/12/2006

Fledderman v. Glunk (In Re Glunk)

Citations

  • 343 B.R. 754
  • 2006 WL 1593989

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • remanding the State Court Action after Dr. Glunk removed it to this court
  • finding “[w]hether or not the Plaintiffs asserted a timely fraud claim in the underlying state litigation bears no significance in the bankruptcy court’s ultimate determination of the nature of the debt and whether such debt is dischargeable pursuant to § 523(a)(2)(A)”
  • expiration of statute of limitations for fraud does not (5) There is a clear and convincing need for a new determination of the issue (a
  • complaints under § 523(a)(2)(A) are governed by the heightened pleading requirements of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 9(b)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Eric L. Frank

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

22 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Fledderman v. Glunk (In Re Glunk)

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.