Giansante & Cobb, LLC v. Singh (In Re Singh)

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• actions based on confusion, ignorance, or mistake do not establish intent to defraud
• “It is well established that a ‘broken promise to repay a debt, without more, will not sustain a cause of action under § 523(a)(2)(A).’” (quoting In re Harrison, 301 B.R. 849, 854 (Bankr. N.D. Ohio 2003)
• “Schedule J requires the Debtor to estimate monthly expenses.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).