Court of Appeals of Maryland· 3/27/1991
Flaherty v. State
Citations
- 587 A.2d 522
- 322 Md. 356
- 1991 Md. LEXIS 65
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that the trial court could not have lawfully imposed a sentence of confinement as a condition of probation, and trial court’s attempt to circumvent the law by denominating the condition of imprisonment as a “precondition” was ineffective and invalid
- holding that the trial court could not have lawfully imposed a sentence of confinement as a condition of probation, and trial court's attempt to circumvent the law by denominating the condition of imprisonment as a \precondition\ was ineffective and invalid
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Murphy, Eldridge, Cole, Rodowsky, McAuliffe, Adkins, Chasanow
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
7 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Taylor v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2004-06-10· cited 35×
- Dedo v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1996-07-31· cited 34×
- Bailey v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1999-08-04· cited 31×
- Holmes v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2000-12-20· cited 31×
- Cameron v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1994-12-29· cited 16×
- Allen v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1992-05-06· cited 13×
- Robinson v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1997-06-18· cited 4×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.