Finney v. Finney

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that a trial court’s discretion concerning child support is subject to the statutory guidelines set forth in section 61.30
• reversing because trial court’s child support calculation failed to account for the alimony award
• “[A] trial court’s discretion concerning child support is subject to the statutory guidelines set forth in section 61.30.... Whether a trial court has complied with the guidelines is a question of law to be reviewed de novo.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Tradler v. Tradler
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2012-11-02· cited 18×
• Shaw v. Nelson
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2009-03-04· cited 15×
• Demont v. Demont
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2011-07-12· cited 10×
• Smith v. Smith
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2008-12-05· cited 5×
• Department of Revenue Ex Rel. Shirer v. Shirer
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2016-08-17· cited 4×
• Ervin v. Florida Department of Revenue
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2014-12-22· cited 2×
• Heysek v. Heysek
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2010-10-01
• Morejon v. Department of Revenue
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2017-08-30
• Brend v. Brend
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2011-04-01
• Pirzada v. Pirzada
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2012-04-20

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Smith v. Smith
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2007-12-31· cited 18×
• Kareff v. Kareff
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2006-11-29· cited 14×
• Langevin v. Langevin
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1997-08-06· cited 8×
• Weiser v. Weiser
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2001-04-18· cited 6×
• Glasgow v. Wolfe
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2004-05-13· cited 6×
• Guelpa v. Guelpa
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2004-10-15· cited 2×