District Court of Appeal of Florida· 7/12/2011
Demont v. Demont
Citations
- 67 So. 3d 1096
- 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 10906
- 2011 WL 2698685
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that installment payment paid to husband after his termination was nonmarital, where purpose of payment was consideration for noncompete agreement
- “As the party seeking alimony, the wife had the burden to prove ... the husband’s ability to pay.”
- “The initial determination as to whether an asset is marital or non-marital is a fact-finding process.”
- ‘‘[p]ermanent periodic alimony is used to provide the needs and necessities of life to a former spouse as they have been established during the marriage’’ [emphasis added; internal quota- tion marks omitted]
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Clark, Lewis, Nortwick
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
10 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Broemer v. BroemerDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2013-03-06· cited 22×
- Gray v. GrayDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2012-12-17· cited 13×
- Gilliard v. GilliardDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2015-04-24· cited 11×
- Bateh v. BatehDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2012-10-12· cited 7×
- Berrios-Rodriguez v. BerriosSupreme Court of The Virgin Islands· 2013-06-18· cited 6×
- Dan v. DanSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2014-12-16
- Harris v. HarrisDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2016-12-02
- FREDERIC BOUIN v. GINA DISABATINODistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2018-06-13
- Bikowitz v. BikowitzDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2012-11-28
- MAKECHIA ROBINSON N/K/A MAKECHIA MCKAY v. NATHANIEL ROBINSON, IIIDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2025-09-05
Cites
32 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Canakaris v. CanakarisSupreme Court of Florida· 1980-03-27· cited 2,288×
- Esaw v. EsawDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2007-10-05· cited 71×
- Ondrejack v. OndrejackDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2003-03-12· cited 66×
- Zeigler v. ZeiglerDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1994-01-14· cited 41×
- Borchard v. BorchardDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1999-03-12· cited 30×
- Engesser v. EngesserDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2010-07-09· cited 29×
- Iribar v. IribarDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1987-07-21· cited 29×
- Hill v. HootenDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2001-01-19· cited 26×
- Rabbath v. FaridDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2009-03-17· cited 26×
- Demont v. DemontDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2009-12-22· cited 24×
- Nichols v. NicholsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2005-07-27· cited 22×
- Farrior v. FarriorSupreme Court of Florida· 1999-06-24· cited 20×
- Smith v. SmithDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2007-12-31· cited 18×
- Wofford v. WoffordDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2009-11-04· cited 16×
- Shea v. SheaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1990-12-26· cited 15×
- Schmidt v. SchmidtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2008-12-10· cited 14×
- Nourse v. NourseDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2007-02-09· cited 13×
- Alcantara v. AlcantaraDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2009-07-29· cited 12×
- Cruz v. CruzDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1990-12-26· cited 12×
- Heinrich v. HeinrichDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1992-11-24· cited 12×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.