Appellate Court of Illinois· 7/13/1988
Finley v. Mercer County
Citations
- 526 N.E.2d 635
- 172 Ill. App. 3d 30
- 122 Ill. Dec. 376
- 1988 Ill. App. LEXIS 1033
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- to obtain a judgment against the county, the plaintiffs had to prove that the county had constructive notice of the allegedly twisted sign
- the plaintiffs could not establish for the purpose of avoiding summary judgment that the defect existed for a sufficient time to charge the county with constructive notice of the defect because the plaintiffs’ testimony undercut the basic theory of their case
- the plaintiffs could not establish for the purpose of avoiding summary judgment that the defect existed for a sufficient time to charge the county with constructive notice of the defect because the plaintiffs’ testimony undercut the basic theory of their case
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Heiple, Scott
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
10 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Brummet v. FarelAppellate Court of Illinois· 1991-08-02· cited 30×
- Burke v. GrilloAppellate Court of Illinois· 1992-04-01· cited 27×
- Ramirez v. City of ChicagoAppellate Court of Illinois· 2000-12-07· cited 21×
- Zameer v. City of ChicagoAppellate Court of Illinois· 2013-07-19· cited 17×
- Perfetti v. Marion County, IllinoisAppellate Court of Illinois· 2013-03-07· cited 12×
- Pandya v. HoerchlerAppellate Court of Illinois· 1993-12-29· cited 10×
- Ory v. City of NapervilleAppellate Court of Illinois· 2023-05-11· cited 4×
- Stewart v. United StatesN.D. Illinois· 1996-02-13· cited 3×
- Lewis v. Rutland TownshipAppellate Court of Illinois· 2005-03-04· cited 3×
- Barr v. FraustoAppellate Court of Illinois· 2017-01-06· cited 3×
Cites
4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Chisolm v. StephensAppellate Court of Illinois· 1977-03-30· cited 88×
- Buford v. Chicago Housing AuthorityAppellate Court of Illinois· 1985-02-11· cited 39×
- Schuman v. Pekin House Restaurant & LoungeAppellate Court of Illinois· 1981-12-09· cited 19×
- Hansen v. Ruby Construction Co.Appellate Court of Illinois· 1987-12-15· cited 11×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.