Burke v. Grillo

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• affirming grant of summary judgment where evidence did not indicate that the hole plaintiff fell into was conspicuous
• disagreeing with another court’s conclusion in a different case because that court “interpreted our decisions in Cooley and McDonald too broadly”
• affirming summary judgment for City where plaintiff tripped on hole in sidewalk but there was “no evidence that the hole was plainly visible or that it was apparent for a long time prior to the injury”
• affirming summary judgment for City where plaintiff tripped on hole in sidewalk but there was \no evidence that the hole was plainly visible or that it was apparent for a long time prior to the injury\
• no appropriation where defendants merely mowed grass and shoveled snow where hole that caused the injury was located
• no appropriation where the defendants merely mowed grass and shoveled snow where hole that caused the injury was located

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).