Finch v. Martin
Citations
- 13 S.D. 274
- 83 N.W. 263
- 1900 S.D. LEXIS 141
Syllabus
<p>1. An application lor a new'trial because of the insufficiency of the evidence to support the verdict being addressed to the discretion of the trial court, its decision thereon is not revievvable unless there has been manifest abuse of such discretion.</p> <p>2. A contention that the trial court was not authorized in granting a new trial, because there was evidence warranting the verdict, cannot be considered on appeal, as the supreme court cannot' weigh all the evidence, or g'o further than to determine whether there is sufficient evidence to sustain the verdict.</p>
Judges: Corson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
2 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Jeansch v. LewisSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 1891-03-04· cited 41×
- Grant v. GrantSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 1894-11-02· cited 19×
- Hodges v. BierleinSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 1893-10-18· cited 17×
- Alt v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.South Dakota Supreme Court· 1894-02-21· cited 17×
- Distad v. ShanklinSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 1898-05-17· cited 14×
- Esshom v. Watertown Hotel Co.South Dakota Supreme Court· 1895-05-11· cited 8×
- C. Gotzian & Co. v. McCollumSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 1896-01-27· cited 6×
- Halpin v. NelsonSupreme Court of Iowa· 1888-12-22· cited 3×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.