Distad v. Shanklin
Citations
- 11 S.D. 1
- 75 N.W. 205
- 1898 S.D. LEXIS 61
Syllabus
<p>1. In a notice of motion for new trial on the ground of irregularity in the proceedings of the jury, a specification that one of the jurors was insane at the time of the trial is sufficient.</p> <p>2. In a notice of motion for new trial oh the ground of insufficiency of the evidence, a specification that the evidence of plaintiff showed the property in suit to be worth a certain sum, which the jury had disregarded (there being no evidence to the contrary) is sufficient.</p> <p>3. The stenographer’s notes need not be filed before the hearing of a motion for new trial made on the minutes of the court.</p> <p>4. A verdict contrary to the instructions will be set aside.</p> <p>5. The grant of a new trial for insufficiency of evidence will not be disturbed in the absence of an abuse of discretion.</p>
Judges: Corson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
11 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Aylmer v. AdamsNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 1915-04-15· cited 60×
- Pengilly v. J. I. Case Threshing Machine Co.North Dakota Supreme Court· 1902-05-23· cited 44×
- Malmstad v. McHenry Telephone Co.North Dakota Supreme Court· 1914-11-11· cited 12×
- Sands v. CruikshankSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 1901-10-02· cited 9×
- State v. AndreSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 1900-12-31· cited 7×
- Rochford v. AlbaughSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 1903-05-08· cited 7×
- Security State Bank v. Bank of CentervilleSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 1923-05-14· cited 5×
- Finch v. MartinSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 1900-06-20· cited 3×
- Troy Min. Co. v. ThomasSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 1901-11-20· cited 3×
- State v. CrowleySouth Dakota Supreme Court· 1906-08-01· cited 3×
- Distad v. ShanklinSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 1902-04-01· cited 1×
Cites
4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Grant v. GrantSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 1894-11-02· cited 19×
- Alt v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.South Dakota Supreme Court· 1894-02-21· cited 17×
- Esshom v. Watertown Hotel Co.South Dakota Supreme Court· 1895-05-11· cited 8×
- C. Gotzian & Co. v. McCollumSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 1896-01-27· cited 6×
Other cases named Distad v. Shanklin
1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.